Links for December 26th through December 30th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 30, 2007 at 7:37 pm

Links for December 21st through December 23rd

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 23, 2007 at 7:40 pm

Links for December 20th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 20, 2007 at 7:49 pm

This Moron is my Congressman

Congress, Culture & Politics, War — Steve on December 20, 2007 at 7:24 am

Jim Moran, who while accusing American troops of ethnically cleansing Iraqis is also known for his anti-Semitic statements, is my Congressman. Yes, this is the type of idiot Northern Virginia sends to Congress.

Links for December 19th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 19, 2007 at 7:36 pm

Links for December 18th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 18, 2007 at 7:31 pm

Links for December 17th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 17, 2007 at 7:43 pm

Huckabee’s Advertisements

2008 Election, Advertising — Steve on December 17, 2007 at 5:51 pm

Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee’s advertisements have been rather interesting this primary campaign. First there was “Believe” an ad that ran in both Iowa and New Hampshire. The ad caught the attention of the media because of the inclusion of the on screen title “CHRISTIAN LEADER” when it ran in Iowa, but not in New Hampshire.

In his most recent ad “What really matters” Huckabee pretends to get above the fray and issue a nonpolitical holiday greeting.

There are two problems with this. First, Huckabee’s political message has simply been that he is a Christian, and that is why you should vote for him. So in reminding you of ‘what really matters’ this season, be it holiday or political, he staying perfectly on message.

Second, there is a not so subliminal message:

huckabee.subliminal.message.jpg

In the ad the camera pans slowly from right to left, and for 19 seconds of the 30 second advertisement the brightly lit white shelves of a cabinet form a big white cross. You know who ever created this ad was well aware of this, as they added a neat pile of Christmas tree ornaments as to make it obvious that it is a shelf that just happens to looks like a cross, rather than a cross outright.

It seems to me the problem is that his ads are not political enough. We’re electing the next Commander-in-Chief, not Pastor-in-Chief.

Update: I see a few minutes after I posted this that Matt Drudge has a link to the video with the headline: “HUCKABEE AD FEATURES FLOATING ‘CROSS’… DEVELOPING…

I guess I wasn’t the only one who noticed.

Links for December 16th

Daily Links — del.icio.us on December 16, 2007 at 7:36 pm

Don’t let a little subtraction get in the way of a good story

2008 Election, News Media — Steve on December 16, 2007 at 2:30 am

Every presidential election various media organizations rerun the same story: They find a Republican fed up with the GOP who is going to vote for a Democrat this time. (Oddly, they don’t ever seem to find any Democrats voting for a Republican.) The first such story I have come across this election cycle is from the New York Times:

Dee Vandeventer, 54, who owns an advertising firm (it does not accept political advertising) and lives in nearby Cedar Falls, was standing on a chair in the auditorium trying to take a picture of Mr. Obama after his speech. She was perched a little precariously up there, but she talked with us for a couple of minutes.

“We’re tired of being Republicans,” she said.

She said she and her husband, Dave, were keeping completely open minds this year and had no idea at this point how they’d vote in the caucuses on Jan. 3. Of the Republicans, they said they were most interested in Rudolph W. Giuliani, mainly because he is “moderate” and “was responsive” on 9/11.

But it took her 23-year-old daughter to get her to consider Mr. Obama in the first place. “I had said, ‘Obama doesn’t have any experience,’ and she said, ‘I have three words for you: John Fitzgerald Kennedy.’” That made Mrs. Vandeventer consider the possibility, she said, even though she voted for Richard Nixon (she was too young to vote in 1960, when Nixon ran against Kennedy, but she voted for him in 1968, when he won).

It is interesting that Katharine Q. Seelye, the Times reporter, could figure out that Mrs. Vandeventer was only 7 years-old in 1960, and unable to vote, but failed to realize that Vandeventer was only 15 years-old in 1968, when the voting age was still 21. It is rather impossible that she voted for Nixon, unless she lied about her age. It makes me wonder if she really is (was?) a Republican as well.

Next Page »
© 2007 Steven Andrew Miller | Linnwood’s Notes